I had a very difficult time trying to find clothes for my boys on my Semi-Annual Big Shopping Trip earlier this year. As usual, the marketers think that moms of boys don’t notice the huge discrepancy between the boys and girls sections. I did notice, in fact, when the boys’ section in Old Navy was half the size of the girls and was nearly empty. In the end, I did find enough to clothe my boys for the winter and fall. Good thing. I’d hate for someone to call Child Protective Services on me for letting my children go naked simply because companies don’t care about boys clothing. That would be unfortunate.

Today, however, I need to rant about the cost of pajamas. I hate buying pajamas. In fact, in the summer months when it’s hot and I’m too cheap to run the air conditioning, the boys sleep in their underwear and a t-shirt. I find paying upwards of $20.00 for pajamas, clothing that they only sleep in and that the rest of the public simply doesn’t see, to be rather ridiculous. I usually hit up discount stores or big sales (remember when I went out on Black Friday last year?) for deals on pajamas. Less than $10 is an acceptable price for me to pay. In fact, one store I visit specifically for this reason often prices their pajamas for $5.99 and that makes me a very happy Shopping Mama. In fact, I recently bought an extra size of Lightning McQueen pajamas at that price so LittleBrother can have a new pair next year at that same glorious price. (Give me a sale and I’ll buy twice as much.)

As much as I hate spending the big bucks on pajamas, I recently broke my rule. If you’re the mom of a boy, you may have noticed the huge selection of firefighter themed pajamas this year. Almost every store I shop at, either online or in brick-and-mortar version, is sporting a pair. Old Navy ($14.50), Crazy8 ($16.50) and Gap ($22.50), just to name a few, all offer very cute firefighter themed pajamas. But all at prices that I’m, quite honestly, not willing to spend since no one but FireDad and very few select people (grandparents, the babysitter) will ever see. I mean, the Gap pajamas are more expensive than the Easter suit that I bought for BigBrother this year. Unless he’s wearing those things to church, school and everything in between, I think not.

But, you see, one of my close friends went shopping with me on the Semi-Annual Big Shopping Trip. She likes me to spend my money. (As I like her to spend hers!) We were in the Carter’s Outlet and she said, “Have you seen the firefighter pajamas?” She dragged me by my ear (slight exaggeration), pulled one off the rack and I died inside. I couldn’t not buy them. I had to purchase them. There was never any debate. Thankfully, due to my savvy-shopping, I was under budget and, therefore, I could afford to splurge on what are, quite honestly, the coolest firefighter jammies on the planet. I paid $12 a pair but, as you can see below, I couldn’t avoid it. It simply had to be done. The money had to be spent.

See?

LittleBrother

BigBrother

As I said, no other option was available but, “Purchase. Immediately.”

I would link you to these wonderful pajamas so that you could purchase them yourselves (you know, since there’s no other option) but Carter’s doesn’t have a large availability online and these were Outlet jammies. I can only urge you to beat feet to the store and pray that they have your child’s size still available. (As a side note, they also have a navy blue and orange firefighter rain jacket in store right now as well. I’m sorry. I also had to purchase that one.)

I write all of this to say: if you are a marketer, researching what to make for boys pajamas, defaulting to fire trucks or firefighter gear will almost guarantee that I, a very choosy Shopping Mom, will buy said pajamas. Whatever the price. That said, please don’t or I’m going to have to start sending my kids to school in pajamas. Is it appropriate to get official pictures taken in pajamas? It is, isn’t it? Lie to me.

_
While my boys now have a mostly full fall-and-winter wardrobe, complete with pajamas that are too expensive for my taste, I am searching for one thing: a solid (non-plaid), red button up shirt in size 4T or big kid’s size 4. BigBrother needs it for Christmas and everyone is all plaid-ed out this year. If you see one, please let me know. Thanks!

Despite getting one negative (and cowardly anonymous) comment on my last post about gender issues and boys’ shirt colors, I heard a general nod of agreement. Yesterday, at church, while talking with the mom of a girl BigBrother’s age and a boy LittleBrother’s age, I got another nod of agreement.

What’s with the total lack of clothing for boys?

Of course, it being Easter Sunday and all, we were talking about Easter clothes. While I procrastinated somewhat this year (which isn’t really the case because I had been stalking online stores for a matching outfit for BigBrother), I was really upset when I got to one store and found that the toddler boys’ section had three outfits, two pair of dress pants and two shirts hanging on one rack whereas the girls had (and I counted) seven racks of frilly, flowery, mostly-pink Easter dresses. Poor FireDad got another earful about the fact that the world wants us to dress girls in overly-girly things, to dress them up at all times and make them feel like pretty, pretty princesses… but, at the same time, we are supposed to dress our boys in sloppy clothing, never dress them up or think of a pastel color being placed next to their tough, manly skin and generally make sure that they are 100% manly at all times.

My question, however, is this: what is unmanly about a man (or, boy as we’re arguing) in a suit? Nothing.

Knowing what I know about business, my guess is that the store I was shopping in was well-aware of shopping trends and knew that parents and grandparents (and friends and neighbors) of girls would be more likely to buy frilly Easter dresses while parents and grandparents of boys in our area don’t normally dress their sons in anything nicer than khaki pants and a polo. While I love the khaki pants and a polo look, I wanted something more for Easter Sunday. And the option wasn’t available.

Sadly, things like this aren’t only noticeable on holidays. Have you ever walked into a store to find that the girl’s section (toddlers and young girls and/or women’s) is larger than the boy’s section? At one of my favorite stores (which is no longer in our area so it’s no longer an issue for me, I suppose), the toddler boy’s section could fit twice to three times in the toddler girl’s section. I once complained to the manager at checkout knowing that she couldn’t do anything about it anyway and she just shrugged.

Alternatives exist online, of course, at boutique boy stores but, especially in this economy, I am not willing or able to shell out more cash than I would on a semi-nice pair of pants for myself on a tshirt for the boys. I’m not saying that I’m not willing to spend the cash on good items of clothing but you know as well as I do that a higher cost does not always equal a higher quality.

In the end, BigBrother ended up with a suit (at half off!) that fit him well, looked nice and garnered hundreds of compliments throughout Easter day. He wore it without complaint, smiling and saying thank you when anyone would tell him that he looked handsome. He didn’t match LittleBrother or even compliment his colors at all (as was my original intent) but, in the end, I don’t think BigBrother minded.

His shirt is half untucked because he was running for Easter eggs!

In fact, I think he was happy just the way he was. (As was LittleBrother. Promise.)

©2010 Jenna Hatfield Suffusion WordPress theme by Sayontan Sinha